Explanation:
This website is saying that the united states is covering up something about dihydrogen monoxide. I dissagree because these people dont sound credible at all. They sound like idions as well, but that is my point of view. case closed.
This website is a mix of facts and fiction to me. Writers can post what they want to say, that's a little bit better than critizendium.com, they let whoever say whatever.
This site seemed to know what they were talking about. I didnt think it was put together that well though. Seemed kind of low budget. I am not to sure if I would trust it without doing some kind of research on this because I dont know anything about it.
This website to me is kind of cartoonish, but I believe the information. The research is legitimate, and the facts seem accurate. And I like the statement on the first page, "...and the goal of the site is to provide an unbiased data clearinghouse...". The fact that this is a controversial topic, gives them initiative to assure the reader.
No. After a quick glance at the site I noticed not one but two advertisements. One for a "shop" to help support DHMO, and then a amazon.com advertisement featuring a DVD entitled South Park and Philosophy. I wouldn't trust this website unless I found information about it from another (reliable) source.
this site seems like a source that you could not trust. Knowing that dihydrogen monoxide is just another word for H2O, or 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen, and since they are talking about how deadly it could be, I do not think this is a site that is very credible. But then on the other hand, I could be totally wrong. If I took the time to research carefully the evidence, then maybe I could come up with a better more trustworthy answer. But for the most part, I doubt the sites information.
I don’t really see the point of this site, its dihydrogen monoxide, dedicated to water. How is there controversy here? Who knows though someone could find this useful
