Answer:
On the one hand, we know that the existence of smoke does not guarantee
(ensure) the existence of fire; it only makes the existence of fire likely or
probable. Thus, although inferring fire on the basis of smoke is reasonable, it is
nevertheless fallible. Insofar as it is possible for there to be smoke without there
being fire, we may be wrong in asserting that there is a fire.
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPS:)
