👤

1. Identify the counterclaim/counterargument mentioned by the author in the paragraph.
2. How did the author respond to the counterargument?
3. What example and evidence from research did the writer provide that showed the opposing
argument was incomplete and not considering alternatives?
4. What other evidences were provided to show that the writer's argument was stronger than the
counterargument?​


1 Identify The Counterclaimcounterargument Mentioned By The Author In The Paragraph2 How Did The Author Respond To The Counterargument3 What Example And Evidenc class=

Sagot :

Answer:

1.(Paragraph 2) Although there is validity to the presented argument, this theory excludes educationally driven programming, some of which is specifically designed to educate children beyond what they might experience by age-appropriate schooling alone. There is incredible value in formal education and the public school system; however, classroom modalities are not the only way children learn about the world around them.

A children learn about the world around them.A DHICAS

2. By explaining not only negative impacts of technology, but its good impact of technology in children's learning From educational Television and I it can entertain children's.

3. Children's learning from educational television

4.(Paragraph 5) Children and adolescents may also find value in television news programming which provides information on current events, such as Nickelodeon network's program titled Nick News. This show detailed topical information, such as politics and environmental issues, in an entertaining televised format which was geared to children and adolescents (Fisch, 2004).