Answer:
Human acts are fully thought out and considered, they have knowledge, intention, acceptance for consequences. At a social level it is what you expect from legislator, judges, planning committees, review boards. At an individual level you expect the person to have had long deliberation over the issue.
Acts of man could be accidents, rash reaction, angry or drunken behaviour, just doing what seemed like a good idea at the time, without really thinking about the consequences. Where exactly the dividing line is between these two takes some judgement. Routine behaviour, “that just the way we do it around here” at some point these excuses are rationalisations for what they know is bad behaviour.
Explanation:
8-)
