Answer:
1. Reliable
2. Non reliable
3. Non reliable
Explanation:
1. Encyclopedias are collections of short, factual entries often written by different contributors who are knowledgeable about the topic. Therefore, encyclopedias are reliable sources of information because they have been edited by experts in various fields.
2. The accuracy of gossip is central to its function as a catalyst of cooperation. As gossip becomes less accurate, people are less likely to use it to discriminate between partners; in turn, their partners' willingness to engage in strategic reputation building could also diminish.
3. In general, blogs should not be considered a reliable scholarly source. While some of them are written by real experts and can be great sources for some topics, many are strongly opinionated and can lack the professionalism expected in a scholarly source.
